Friday, February 11, 2011

Would you think that donor conceived children of lesbian parents do better than typical families?

Would you think that donor conceived children of lesbian parents do better than typical families? Read this article...
In an interesting contrast to the study put out by the Institute for American Values, a study published in a recent issue of Pediatrics found that children of lesbian couples, conceived with donor sperm, do better than typical families.
According to the article on CNN, the 25-year study followed 78 couples who conceived using donor sperm. The mothers were interviewed during pregnancy or the donor-insemination process, and when the children were ages 2, 5, 10 and 17. The children were also interviewed four times as they matured.
When the children were 17, they took an online questionnaire, which looked at their psychological, social, and academic adjustment.
Researchers used the Child Behavior Checklist, which is a standard method of determining behavioral and social health in children. The children of the lesbian couples did better than average on the test, when compared to typical families. They scored higher in psychological well being, and had fewer behavioral problems.
As for why they did better (as opposed to doing just as well), it's not clear. It could be because these were well planned pregnancies, very much wanted, and the moms were older (and therefore more mature) than the average family.
As with any study, there is always the potential for bias, and this study was on the small side with 78 families. However, there are some key differences between this study and the study from the Institute for American Values (which was also on sperm donor-conceived children):
  • This study appeared in a peer reviewed, professional journal.
  • While funding for this study did come from a gay/lesbian advocacy group, according to the researchers, they had no part in the design or carrying out of the study.
  • Standard tools of assessment were used in evaluating the children, as opposed to questionnaires developed solely for the study's purpose.
This is certainly a topic that needs more research. But it does show that donor-conceived children are not necessarily at greater risk for psychological distress, as the study from the Institute for American Values would have you believe.

Source

Telling Donor Conceived Children About Their Origins

What do you tell your donor child – and when?

It’s better for children conceived by donor insemination to be told of their origins at an early age, according to the first large-scale study of people who are aware of their donor conception. If the children aren’t told until they’re 18 or older, they’re more likely to have feelings of shock and anger, according to a study just  presented at the 24th annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology in Barcelona.
The study is one of the first to compare the views of the children after donor insemination told of their origins during childhood compared with those who only found out in adulthood. The researchers recruited a sample of 165 children conceived by sperm donation through the Donor Sibling Registry, a US-based, worldwide website that enables donor offspring to search for their donors and their donor siblings (other donor children who share the same donor). The participants answered an online questionnaire consisting of multiple-choice and open-ended questions. They were aged 13-61; 148 (89%) were living in the US and four (2%) were living in the UK; the majority (approximately three-quarters) were female.

For all children, the most common feeling was curiosity… but those told in adulthood were more likely to  feel confused, shocked and upset

Dr Vasanti Jadva, a research associate at the Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge (UK), found that children born into mother-only or same-sex parent families were much more likely to be told about their origins before the age of 3 than were children of heterosexual parents: 63%, 56% and 9% respectively. Indeed, 33% of children in heterosexual families were told about their conception after the age of 18, compared with none in the other two types of families. Two children from heterosexual parents only found out when told by people who were not their parents.
“We asked the children how they felt at the time they found out about their conception, excluding those that found out before the age of three as they would have been too young to recall their feelings,” says Dr Jadva. “For all children, the most common feeling was curiosity, irrespective of the age at which they found out. However, there were differences according to the age at which they’d been told of their conception, with those told during adulthood more likely to report feeling confused, shocked, upset, relieved, numb and angry.”
For instance, 37% of those told when aged 4-11 reported feeling confused, compared to 52% told when aged 12-18, and 69% told when aged over 18. In the respective age groups, 27%, 58% and 75% respectively reported feeling shocked; 16%, 23% and 44% reported feeling upset; 6%, 26% and 38% reported feeling relieved; 6%, 26% and 38% reported feeling numb; and 12%, 13% and 38% reported feeling angry. Examples of comments made by the participants included this, from an adult who found out when he was 17: “I would have appreciated revelation of this information much earlier in my life. Learning of my biological identity at 17 years of age was a traumatic event.” A late teen who found out at the age of 12 commented: “Either tell your kid from the beginning or don’t tell them at all. It was one of the most shocking and upsetting moments of my life. I felt alone.” Conversely, a 13 year old who found out at age 4 said, “I was so young I don't remember feeling much more than interested and curious.”
“With regards to how children felt towards their mother at the time of finding out, those told in adolescence or adulthood were more likely to report feeling angry about being lied to and betrayal,” says Dr Jadva. “Those told as children were more likely to state that it made no difference to how they felt towards their mother compared to those told later in life.” According to whether they were told between 4-11, 12-18 or over 18, 12%, 29% and 47% respectively felt angry at being lied to, and 12%, 23% and 34% felt betrayal. There were no statistically significant differences in feelings of offspring towards their father at the time of disclosure.
When asked how they felt currently about their conception, the most common response was curiosity, reported by 69% of the children. There were significant differences for those feeling angry, relieved and shocked, with those told after the age of 18 more likely to report these feelings. By contrast, a 15 year old, told before the age of 3, commented: “I’ve grown up knowing how I was conceived. I’ve always accepted it because I never knew any different. Now that I am a little older the only thing that’s changed is that I’m a bit more curious.”
Dr Jadva concludes, “This study shows that age of disclosure is important in determining donor children’s feeling about their conception. It appears it is better for children to be told about their donor conception at an early age. This finding is in line with research on adoption, which also shows that children benefit from early disclosure about the circumstances of their birth. In light of the trend toward greater openness, it is important we recognize that telling offspring of their conception may evoke a sense of curiosity about their origins which could lead them to seek out their donor relations. In fact, we have found that offspring show high levels of interest in contacting not only their donor, but also their donor siblings. Offspring from this study have gone on to find an average of four donor siblings, with a maximum of 13.”

Donor Dad Questionnaire

Most children in our experience will want to know you as a real person- rather than a number on a catalogue- as early as possible. They want to know that you chose their parent/s – and have an interest in what happens post conception- even just to know they are going to be loved and well cared for. They want to know 'real' things about you- and the following list has been created based on what the children I have worked with, would like to know about their donor dad. It doesn't mean they will want to meet you- but they will, more likely than not, want to know of you. This information is invaluable growing up- especially when other children start asking questions. Even taking the time to write it shows the child you cared enough- and will mean the world to them.
The Child Listener™ is working with other professionals to create books, pamphlets and workshops to help parents of sperm donor conceived children transition from the early years through to adulthood with a positive self-image linked with knowledge of their biological origins. In part this means knowing of their biological identity. This questionnaire shows them parts of you- and you will be a part of them forever, regardless of whether you are involved post conception or not.
Use these questions as a starting point- answer as simply or fully as you wish- change the questions if you wish- and add more. You can do this without giving information that would lead to you being traced- if this is a concern to you.
Ask yourself- if I didn't know anything about my biological father- what would I have wanted to know.
If possible, please type the answers to the questions- and handwrite the personal message at the end, and end it with your name (in your handwriting).
If you do have a photo – even if it is you as a child- and don't mind adding it- that would be wonderful. Children also love to see pics of your pets etc.
Thank you so much for the gift of life- and for taking the time to help these families and children even after conception. This information is invaluable to so many.

The Donor Dad Questionnaire can be found here

If you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask

info@childrendeservetoknow.com

My Donor Dad - Welcome!

We are now realising how important it is that children know where they come from- as we hear of the sadness and sense of loss- or incomplete 'identity' when finding out they were adopted, or born through egg or sperm donation, or surrogacy. Some children (now adults) born through anonymous sperm donation for example are now speaking out of their experiences- some good- some not so good- but the majority speak of wanting to know their biological origins. Anonymous sperm donation is being abolished in many countries, as the child's needs and rights are being more carefully considered.


However even when a 'known donor' is used, the child (and parents) are still in the dark until they are fully grown. The Child Listener™ believes that this needs to be addressed - and alternatives found- so that future generations of children do not need to go through life not knowing where they come from.
Partly because of this, she created the 'Free Sperm Donations Worldwide - FSDW' web site in 2003- connecting women and couples with sperm donors who are not only willing to be known, but to actually in many cases be known to the child before 18. Alternative arrangements are being made- with some donors playing an active part in the child's life as 'Donor Dad'  - and some even co-parenting.  With all arrangements issues are discussed before the conception even takes place. Choices are being made with the focus being on the child who, if conceived using a traditional sperm donor (eg through a sperm bank) would not be able to know anything of his 'Donor Dad' until 18.

The focus throughout the 'Children Deserve' site is that it is nurture rather than nature (especially PARENTING ) that determines the emotional and social development of young children- even though EVERY CHILD has the right to know of his biological origins, as early as possible.
We support those raising adopted and donor conceived children- and those born through surrogacy- regardless of whether they are the biological parents, or not. Promoting Positive Parenting.
Also note that we take little heed to those who seek to imply, or who purposely seek out to prove, that being born through sperm or egg donation, or surrogacy (or where adopted) means that these children are destined - or more likely- to lead troubled lives. Or that children 'should' be raised only by straight, married fertile couples in order to have the best chance of happiness and success in life.
The experiences of children born through anonymous sperm donation is currently being widely discussed - especially on the internet- as several adults are now requesting- in court- that they be told of their origins. These were children who had no choice with regards to what information they would want to receive. However these men chose to remain anonymous- so should the laws be retrospectively be changed- and does this mean that the child's right to know of his origins is considered more important than the rights of the parents who chose the donor, wanting anonimity at the time, and the man who donated - choosing anonimity?

On the 'My Donor Dad' site we also encourage people to discuss issues relating to alternative arrangements made outside of the 'system', including co-parenting without romance.
We encourage donors to speak in confidence of their experiences - and for us to learn from arrangements that appear to be working for all. Are there solutions?

Warning about the 'Anonymous Us' Project

This is a direct quote from someone who contacted us with concerns.

It is posted here with his permission (thank you H)

__________________________________________________________________________________________


 

I thought this site (The Anonymous Us project) was a great idea until I did a bit of digging. And read articles such as  http://lezgetreal.com/2011/01/nom-uses-site-about-sperm-donation-stories-to-further-homophobic-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-125483
 
I thought the Anonymous Us project was to be a site where people could share experiences- and that all experiences would be put forward (I have a positive experience - which is why I was originally looking at the site) However I soon found out that this isnt the case. The site owner is trying to encourage negative stories as she (and her promoters) have the view that children should only be created by married straight fertile couples. These negative stories are used as 'evidence' to support her views.

She is funded/ supported by groups such as the 'Institute for American Family Values' who appear to, again, only support that children be conceived to straight, married, fertile couples. You can see how this project is being advertised, through such groups, for example through very one sided and judgmental articles such as Untold Story of Donor Conceived Children - http://blog.christianitytoday.com/women/2011/01/the_untold_story_of_spermdonor.html within which it states:
" According to Elizabeth Marquardt, director of the Center for Marriage and Families at the Institute for American Values and editor of FamilyScholars.org, half of young adults who are conceived by sperm donation are "disturbed about the circumstances of their conception." "Overall, compared to those who are raised by their biological parents, they are more likely to struggle with mental illness or substance abuse or depression," Marquardt told NPR last summer."
 
Please take any reference to this 'research' or 'studies' by these groups with a very big pinch of salt. There are many peer reviewed and more accurate studies that actually show the opposite to be true. Alana Stewart cites the projects- funded by those with a clear agenda- on various posts.
 
Look instead at 'real' research - for example In a 2001 article in Child Development (Vol. 72, No. 2, pages 559-608) Golombok found that children in families that underwent IVF were as well-adjusted on a range of social and emotional measures as matched youngsters who were adopted or conceived naturally. A study in Human Reproduction by Golombok and colleagues, published online March 29, reports on the third wave of a longitudinal study of youngsters who are now 3 and their parents. Families that conceived via donor egg or sperm, surrogates or naturally were a lot alike with one exception: Women who had conceived via an assisted method were more warm and interactive with their children than those who had conceived naturally.
 
Elizabeth Marquardt - one of Alana's biggest supporters- makes statements such as
(10 Feb 2011)
" Your donor will fall in love with your kids. His kids. This is a fact. Get used to it now. If your donor does not fall in love with your kids, congratulations: you just had children with a psychopath. "
Direct quote (to lesbian couples) from Elizabeth Marquardt - http://familyscholars.org/2011/02/10/and-baby-makes-more/
 
Alana posted this recently - to the Family Scholars web site- after a workshop for parents considering using reproductive technologies to grow their familes.
http://familyscholars.org/2010/06/08/a-sunday-in-the-shark-tank/
She is so vehemently opposed to children being 'manufactured' as she describes the conception of children not 'born naturally' that she is unable to even consider other points of view. So for her to be fronting a site that should be for people to be able to share stories freely, this is of great concern. Little do they know that any negative story will be used in her campaign to abolish reproductive technologies.
 
So before you unwittingly support her by posting, do a little research on Alana Stewart and post knowing what your story is going to be used for. Of course if its a positive one you are unlikely to see it anywhere- although they generally use one to demonstrate their 'fairness'. Be warned.